Appendix A
Table 1
names of baseline scores, baseline maximum scores, and training scores

Table 2
enhancement scores used in comparisons

Table 3
abbreviated names of experiential dimension scores for "A" and "B" conditions from questionnaire E1

Table 4
"standard" covariates for "A" and "B" conditions

table 5
four types of correlations
|
|
A Enhancement Scores For Condition "A" (Ac/Baseline) |
B Enhancement Scores For Condition "B" (Bc/Baseline) (Control) |
|
A Experiential Scores(Subject'S Experience Of Condition A) |
Aa |
Ba |
|
B Experiential Scores (Subject'S Experience Of Condition B) |
Ab |
Bb |
Table 6
differences in eeg scores among training scores and baselines
Univariate F-tests with (1,255) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
A Vs. BL 3.12018 474.82652 3.12018 1.86206 1.67566 .197
B Vs. BL 13.09753 389.62938 13.09753 1.52796 8.57192 .004 *
A Vs. B 3.22257 67.36884 3.22257 .26419 12.19786 .001
*** - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .001
* - Signif. LE .01 ** - Signif. LE .001 * - Signif. LE .01 ** - Signif. LE .001
Table 7
differences in experiential dimension scores between conditions
* * * * * * A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E -- DESIGN 1 * * * * * *
EFFECT .. CONDN
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 5 1/2, N = 98 )
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .04743 .75843 13.00 198.00 .703
Hotellings .04980 .75843 13.00 198.00 .703
Wilks .95257 .75843 13.00 198.00 .703
Roys .04743
Note.. F statistics are exact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Univariate F-tests with (1,210) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
merging 1.09464 315.30227 1.09464 1.50144 .72906 .394
separating .31605 237.94990 .31605 1.13309 .27892 .598
within-sense simultaneous .00597 131.78626 .00597 .62755 .00951 .922
within-sense field size .10563 158.51308 .10563 .75482 .13994 .709
between-sense simultaneou 1.24275 316.68238 1.24275 1.50801 .82410 .365
between-sense field size .71847 346.66012 .71847 1.65076 .43524 .510
multisensory perception .00090 202.94980 .00090 .96643 .00093 .976
fragmentation-integration .20912 92.50239 .20912 .44049 .47475 .492
incorporation of opposite .08962 166.49907 .08962 .79285 .11304 .737
exclusion .99411 114.82787 .99411 .54680 1.81806 .179
concentration .00435 343.44753 .00435 1.63546 .00266 .959
overall widening .27194 132.34719 .27194 .63022 .43150 .512
attention to weaker stimu .00049 164.34322 .00049 .78259 .00063 .980
Table 8
Interactions of eye-movement preference by conditions on experiential scores
* * * * * * A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E -- DESIGN 1 * * * * * * EFFECT .. EYEMOVEM BY CONDN
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 5 1/2, N = 98 )
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .10933 1.86956 13.00 198.00 .036 *
Hotellings .12275 1.86956 13.00 198.00 .036 *
Wilks .89067 1.86956 13.00 198.00 .036 *
Roys .10933
Note.. F statistics are exact.
EFFECT .. EYEMOVEM BY CONDN (Cont.)
Univariate F-tests with (1,210) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
merging .00853 315.30227 .00853 1.50144 .00568 .940
separating .49545 237.94990 .49545 1.13309 .43725 .509
within-sense simultaneous .25751 131.78626 .25751 .62755 .41033 .522
within-sense field size 4.07572 158.51308 4.07572 .75482 5.39956 .021 *
between-sense simultaneou .22459 316.68238 .22459 1.50801 .14893 .700
between-sense field size 1.73226 346.66012 1.73226 1.65076 1.04937 .307
multisensory perception 1.48027 202.94980 1.48027 .96643 1.53170 .217
fragmentation-integration .39439 92.50239 .39439 .44049 .89534 .345
incorporation of opposite .06672 166.49907 .06672 .79285 .08415 .772
exclusion .08364 114.82787 .08364 .54680 .15296 .696
concentration 7.10630 343.44753 7.10630 1.63546 4.34513 .038 *
overall widening .05973 132.34719 .05973 .63022 .09478 .758
attention to weaker stimu .00782 164.34322 .00782 .78259 .00999 .920
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .001
Table 9
differences in experiential scores between conditions for left-movers
* * * * * * A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E -- DESIGN 1 * * * * * *
EFFECT .. CONDN
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 5 1/2, N = 41 )
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .22793 1.90753 13.00 84.00 .040 *
Hotellings .29521 1.90753 13.00 84.00 .040 *
Wilks .77207 1.90753 13.00 84.00 .040 *
Roys .22793
Note.. F statistics are exact.
EFFECT .. CONDN (Cont.)
Univariate F-tests with (1,96) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
merging 1.62121 143.72282 1.62121 1.49711 1.08289 .301
separating 1.16478 108.30189 1.16478 1.12814 1.03248 .312
within-sense simultaneous .32614 52.82432 .32614 .55025 .59271 .443
within-sense field size .66250 60.76324 .66250 .63295 1.04668 .309
between-sense simultaneou .55977 116.35352 .55977 1.21202 .46185 .498
between-sense field size 1.89009 138.22447 1.89009 1.43984 1.31271 .255
multisensory perception .40711 105.54706 .40711 1.09945 .37029 .544
fragmentation-integration .07086 53.92612 .07086 .56173 .12615 .723
incorporation of opposite .10118 74.87347 .10118 .77993 .12973 .719
exclusion .89464 45.77755 .89464 .47685 1.87615 .174
concentration 2.23393 135.22850 2.23393 1.40863 1.58589 .211
overall widening .03039 72.93191 .03039 .75971 .04000 .842
attention to weaker stimu .27868 81.43253 .27868 .84826 .32854 .568
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .001
Table 10
differences between right-movers and left-movers on experiential scores EFFECT .. EYEMOVEM
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 5 1/2, N = 98 )
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .15038 2.69589 13.00 198.00 .002 *
Hotellings .17700 2.69589 13.00 198.00 .002 *
Wilks .84962 2.69589 13.00 198.00 .002 *
Roys .15038
Note.. F statistics are exact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EFFECT .. EYEMOVEM (Cont.)
Univariate F-tests with (1,210) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
merging 3.90486 591.73019 3.90486 2.81776 1.38580 .240
separating 5.53463 709.58421 5.53463 3.37897 1.63796 .202
within-sense simultaneous 22.90048 551.45657 22.90048 2.62598 8.72072 .004 *
within-sense field size 47.18515 518.13731 47.18515 2.46732 19.12404 .000 **
between-sense simultaneou 32.74868 910.77180 32.74868 4.33701 7.55098 .007 *
between-sense field size 52.73033 656.48783 52.73033 3.12613 16.86759 .000 **
multisensory perception 48.38922 802.14833 48.38922 3.81975 12.66815 .000 **
fragmentation-integration 6.93373 433.17950 6.93373 2.06276 3.36139 .068
incorporation of opposite 2.50682 719.45883 2.50682 3.42599 .73171 .393
exclusion .31079 390.60939 .31079 1.86004 .16709 .683
concentration .01262 568.89676 .01262 2.70903 .00466 .946
overall widening 9.73293 316.69137 9.73293 1.50805 6.45396 .012 *
attention to weaker stimu .22139 384.01867 .22139 1.82866 .12107 .728
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .001
Table 11
covariate differences between conditions
* * * * * * A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E -- DESIGN 1 * * * * * *
EFFECT .. CONDN
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 3 , N = 105 )
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .39365 17.20430 8.00 212.00 .000 **
Hotellings .64922 17.20430 8.00 212.00 .000 **
Wilks .60635 17.20430 8.00 212.00 .000 **
Roys .39365
Note.. F statistics are exact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EFFECT .. CONDN (Cont.)
Univariate F-tests with (1,219) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
mood 500.39194 1302.45874 500.39194 5.94730 84.13766 .000 **
arousal 165.86016 1159.20771 165.86016 5.29319 31.33466 .000 **
abundance of feedback .16851 100.29586 .16851 .45797 .36796 .545
occulomotor strategy .00366 67.99621 .00366 .31048 .01178 .914
sensory deprivation .00424 82.39492 .00424 .37623 .01127 .916
expectation-motivation 18.11157 366.24929 18.11157 1.67237 10.82987 .001 **
perceived success 22.97895 281.70764 22.97895 1.28634 17.86388 .000 **
perceived task difficulty 56.78006 174.35487 56.78006 .79614 71.31910 .000 **
* - Signif. LE .05
** - Signif. LE .001
Table 12
differences in enhancement scores between conditions
* * * * * * A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E -- DESIGN 1 * * * * * *
EFFECT .. CONDN
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 2 1/2, N = 124 )
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .08419 3.28322 7.00 250.00 .002 *
Hotellings .09193 3.28322 7.00 250.00 .002 *
Wilks .91581 3.28322 7.00 250.00 .002 *
Roys .08419
Note.. F statistics are exact.
Univariate F-tests with (1,256) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
AC\B1 VS BC\B1 .09338 2.09154 .09338 .00817 11.43003 .001 **
AC\B1 VS BC\B2 .10007 2.23022 .10007 .00871 11.48637 .001 **
AC\B3 VS BC\B3 .08887 1.70094 .08887 .00664 13.37547 .000 **
AC\B123 VS BC\B123 .06445 2.09056 .06445 .00817 7.89168 .005 *
AC\MAXB2 VS BC\MAXB2 .07955 1.73603 .07955 .00678 11.73136 .001 **
AC\MAXAV VS BC\MAXAV .07558 1.59304 .07558 .00622 12.14493 .001 **
AC\MAXA VS BC\MAXA .06541 1.36425 .06541 .00533 12.27346 .001 **
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .001
Table 13
differences in enhancement scores between conditions for right-movers and left-movers
* * * * * * A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E -- DESIGN 1 * * * * * *EFFECT .. MWITHIN EYEMOVEM(1) (LEFT-MOVERS) BY CONDN
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 2 1/2, N = 124 )
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .05648 2.13785 7.00 250.00 .040 *
Hotellings .05986 2.13785 7.00 250.00 .040 *
Wilks .94352 2.13785 7.00 250.00 .040 *
Roys .05648
Note.. F statistics are exact.
Univariate F-tests with (1,256) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
Ac\B1 Vs Bc\B1 .05019 2.09154 .05019 .00817 6.14282 .014 *
Ac\B1 Vs Bc\B2 .05415 2.23022 .05415 .00871 6.21626 .013 *
Ac\B3 Vs Bc\B3 .05127 1.70094 .05127 .00664 7.71685 .006 *
Ac\B123 Vs Bc\B123 .04052 2.09056 .04052 .00817 4.96234 .027 *
Ac\Maxb2 Vs Bc\Maxb2 .04182 1.73603 .04182 .00678 6.16723 .014 *
Ac\Maxav Vs Bc\Maxav .04082 1.59304 .04082 .00622 6.55997 .011 *
Ac\Maxa Vs Bc\Maxa .03505 1.36425 .03505 .00533 6.57623 .011 *
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .001
___________________________________________________________________________
EFFECT .. MWITHIN EYEMOVEM(2) (RIGHT-MOVERS) BY CONDN
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 2 1/2, N = 124 )
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .04628 1.73302 7.00 250.00 .102
Hotellings .04852 1.73302 7.00 250.00 .102
Wilks .95372 1.73302 7.00 250.00 .102
Roys .04628
Note.. F statistics are exact.
Univariate F-tests with (1,256) D. F.
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
Ac\B1 Vs Bc\B1 .04330 2.09154 .04330 .00817 5.29966 .022 *
Ac\B1 Vs Bc\B2 .04605 2.23022 .04605 .00871 5.28554 .022 *
Ac\B3 Vs Bc\B3 .03804 1.70094 .03804 .00664 5.72527 .017 *
Ac\B123 Vs Bc\B123 .02482 2.09056 .02482 .00817 3.03927 .082
Ac\Maxb2 Vs Bc\Maxb2 .03777 1.73603 .03777 .00678 5.56960 .019 *
Ac\Maxav Vs Bc\Maxav .03485 1.59304 .03485 .00622 5.60039 .019 *
Ac\Maxa Vs Bc\Maxa .03043 1.36425 .03043 .00533 5.70937 .018 *
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .001
Table 14
summary of correlations of training scores and experiential scores controlling for baselines
|
|
Enhancement Scores For Condition A |
Enhancement Scores For Condition B |
|
A experiential scores(subject's experience of condition A) |
merging separat*wthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssibtwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
merging sepratewthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssibtwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
|
B experiential scores (subject's experience of condition B) |
merging separatwthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssibtwnsfsmultisp*fragintincorop*exclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
merging separatwthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssibtwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
(Significant correlations in bold, positive correlations in underline italic, and in caps if it has a contrasting negative correlation in another condition.)
Table 15
summary of positive and negative contrasting correlations
|
|
Enhancement Scores For Condition A |
Enhancement Scores For Condition B |
type of correlation |
|
A experiential scores(subject's experience of condition A) |
wthnssi - fragint - |
wthnssi + fragint + |
enhancement scores with baselines and standard covariates |
|
|
A experiential scores (subject's experience of condition A) |
B experiential scores (subject's experience of condition B) |
type of correlation |
|
Enhancement Scores For Condition A |
concent - |
concent + |
enhancement scores with no covariates |
table 16
possible pattern of significant correlations for different groups
|
|
Enhancement Scores For Condition A |
Enhancement Scores For Condition B |
|
A experiential scores(subject's experience of condition A) |
entire group negativeright-movers negative |
right-movers positive |
|
B experiential scores (subject's experience of condition B) |
entire group negativeleft-movers negative |
|
Table 17
Significant covariates for between-condition differences in experiential scores
* * * * * * A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E -- DESIGN 1 * * * * * Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term
Dependent variable .. MERGING
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
perceived success .42982 .36241 .099 4.342 .000 *
Dependent variable .. SEPARATING
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
sensory deprivation .25348 -.14572 .138 -1.831 .0694
Dependent variable .. WITHIN-SENSE SIMULTANEOUS
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
abundance of feedback .26751 .21685 .096 2.793 .006 *
expectation-motivation .08549 .13261 .044 1.930 .055 *
task difficulty .19779 .21187 .064 3.087 .002 *
Dependent variable .. WITHIN-SENSE FIELD SIZE
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
arousal .06925 .17950 .033 2.109 .036 *
Dependent variable .. BETWEEN-SENSE SIMULTANEOUS
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
abundance of feedback .33746 .18216 .148 2.273 .024 *
task difficulty .20255 .14449 .099 2.040 .043 *
Dependent variable .. BETWEEN SENSE FIELD SIZE
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
abundance of feedback .27478 .14350 .155 1.769 .078
Dependent variable .. MULTI-SENSORY PERCEPTION
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
abundance of feedback .25020 .16684 .119 2.105 .036 *
task difficulty .21187 .18669 .080 2.665 .008 *
Dependent variable .. FRAGMENTATION - INTEGRATION
cOVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
abundance of feedback .19589 .19360 .080 2.441 .015 *
task difficulty .12060 .15751 .054 2.247 .026 *
Dependent variable .. INCORPORATION OF OPPOSITE STATES
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
arousal -.06818 -.16995 .034 -2.026 .044 *
sensory deprivation .26891 .17856 .116 2.322 .021 *
Dependent variable .. EXCLUSION
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
abundance of feedback .19508 .17593 .089 2.182 .030 *
perceived success -.14876 -.22536 .060 -2.490 .014 *
Dependent variable .. CONCENTRATION
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
expectation-motivation .30535 .13091 .161 1.891 .060
occulomotor .14850 .14786 .072 2.076 .039 *
Dependent variable .. OVERALL WIDENING
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t
abundance of feedback. .36393 .29540 .096 3.792 .000 **
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .001
Table 18
correlation of enhancement scores with covariates (not controlled for baseline)
- - Correlation Coefficients - -
AMOOD BMOOD AAROUSAL BAROUSAL AABUNDFB BABUNDFB AOCCUMOT BOCCUMOT ASENSDEP
AC_B1 .0848 -.0068 .1331* .0511 .0300 -.0357 .0603 .0601 .0004
BC_B1 .0314 .0184 .0930 .1050 .0329 -.0413 .0464 .0289 -.0259
AC_B2 .0323 -.0574 .1285* -.0008 .0581 .0339 .0442 .0294 -.0172
BC_B2 -.0180 -.0374 .0926 .0586 .0600 .0288 .0380 .0061 -.0464
AC_B3 -.0049 .0337 .1365* .0119 .1629* .1474* .0650 .1069 .0333
BC_B3 -.0420 .0417 .0652 .0342 .1576* .1651** .0588 .0898 -.0027
AC_B123 .0171 -.0143 .1179 -.0030 .1180 .1208 .0589 .0797 .0062
BC_B123 -.0126 .0150 .0953 .0843 .0970 .0613 .0459 .0368 -.0254
AC_MAXB2 .0062 -.0641 .1265 -.0102 .0600 .0398 .0439 .0362 .0551
BC_MAXB2 -.0467 -.0493 .0907 .0423 .0608 .0366 .0412 .0162 .0303
AC_MAXAV .0649 -.0328 .1418* -.0097 .0957 .0866 .0432 .0647 .0470
BC_MAXAV .0097 -.0106 .1207 .0571 .0926 .0573 .0230 .0148 .0276
AC_MAXA .0770 -.0338 .1291* .0155 .0678 .0778 -.0019 .0264 .0450
BC_MAXA .0310 -.0263 .0958 .0675 .0672 .0689 -.0141 -.0118 .0237
BSENSDEP AEXPMOTI BEXPMOTI APERCSUC BPERCSUC ATASKDIF
AC_B1 .0272 .1085 .0217 .0383 -.0613 .0023
BC_B1 .0001 .0344 -.0867 -.0639 -.1361* -.0567
AC_B2 -.0138 .0179 .0852 .0271 -.0151 -.0081
BC_B2 -.0428 -.0541 -.0282 -.0784 -.0977 -.0721
AC_B3 .0750 .1092 .1710** -.0415 -.0944 .0141
BC_B3 .0691 .0319 .0554 -.1353* -.0940 -.0278
AC_B123 .0517 .0698 .1474* -.0196 -.0171 .0164
BC_B123 .0124 .0027 -.0178 -.1198 -.1321* -.0634
AC_MAXB2 .0692 .0454 .0927 -.0006 -.0072 -.0275
BC_MAXB2 .0430 -.0259 -.0174 -.1014 -.0812 -.0860
AC_MAXAV .0904 .1078 .0995 -.0103 -.0313 -.0246
BC_MAXAV .0444 .0248 -.0235 -.1048 -.1414* -.0969
AC_MAXA .0644 .1101 .1023 -.0570 -.0371 -.0418
BC_MAXA .0345 .0353 -.0054 -.1475* -.1055 -.0997
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .01 (2-tailed) " . " printed if a coefficient cannot be computed
Table 19
summary of correlations of enhancement scores and experiential scores for left-movers, controlling for baselines and standard covariates
|
|
Enhancement Scores For Condition A |
Enhancement Scores For Condition B |
|
A experiential scores(subject's experience of condition A) |
merging separatwthnssi*wthnsfsbtwnssibtwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
merging sepratewthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssi*btwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
|
B experiential scores (subject's experience of condition B) |
mergingseparatwthnssi*wthnsfs*btwnssi*btwnsfsmultisp*fragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
mergingseparatwthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssi*btwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
(Significant correlations in bold, positive correlations in underline italic, and in caps if it has a contrasting negative correlation in another condition.)
Table 20
summary of correlations of enhancement scores and experiential scores for right-movers, controlling for baselines and standard covariates
|
|
Enhancement Scores For Condition A |
Enhancement Scores For Condition B |
|
A experiential scores(subject's experience of condition A) |
mergingseparatwthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssibtwnsfsmultispfragintincorop*exclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
merging separatewthnssiwthnsfs*btwnssibtwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
|
B experiential scores (subject's experience of condition B) |
mergingseparatwthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssibtwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
merging separatwthnssiwthnsfsbtwnssibtwnsfsmultispfragintincoropexclusnconcentoverawidatnweak |
(Significant correlations in bold, positive correlations in underline italic, and in caps if it has a contrasting negative correlation in another condition.)
Table 21
correlations between EEG baselines and experiential dimensions for E-1 and PCI
- - Correlation Coefficients - -
AMERGING BMERGING ASEPARAT BSEPARAT AWTHNSSI BWTHNSSI AWTHNSFS BWTHNSFS ABTWNSSI
B1 .0832 .0596 -.0107 -.1096 -.2229** -.2845** -.2004** -.2310** -.2275**
B2 .0921 .0422 .0210 -.1326* -.2288** -.3151** -.2064** -.2578** -.2404**
B3 .0614 .0710 -.0137 -.1703** -.2239** -.3138** -.2407** -.2963** -.2357**
BBTWNSSI ABTWNSFS BBTWNSFS AMULTISP BMULTISP AFRAGINT BFRAGINT AINCOROP BINCOROP
B1 -.2897** -.0842 -.1069 -.0906 -.1962** -.0153 -.0924 .0047 -.1050
B2 -.2945** -.1105 -.1442* -.0953 -.2175** -.0087 -.1057 .0057 -.0990
B3 -.3118** -.1202 -.1555* -.1026 -.2203** -.0833 -.1350* .0288 -.1033
AEXCLUSN BEXCLUSN ACONCENT BCONCENT AOVRAWID BOVRAWID AATNWEAK BATNWEAK APBODIMG
B1 .0683 -.0296 .0819 -.0684 -.0465 -.0879 .0540 .0717 -.1463*
B2 .0778 -.0127 .0988 -.0529 -.0635 -.1228* .0502 .0961 -.1630**
B3 .0242 -.0585 -.0130 -.1005 -.0892 -.1343* -.0405 .0064 -.1916**
BPBODIMG APTIMPER BPTIMPER APPERCEP BPPERCEP APMEANNG BPMEANNG APJOY BPJOY
B1 -.1293* .1088 -.0064 -.0980 -.0774 -.1087 -.1143 -.0959 -.1360*
B2 -.1338* .0789 -.0077 -.1242* -.1180 -.1430* -.1408* -.1057 -.1652**
B3 -.1536* .1144 -.0308 -.1106 -.0926 -.1151 -.1212 -.1150 -.1981**
APSEXEXC BPSEXEXC APLOVE BPLOVE APANGER BPANGER APSADNES BPSADNES APFEAR
B1 -.2192** -.1398* -.0878 -.1119 -.1996** -.1878** -.2434** -.2594** -.1874**
B2 -.2265** -.1491* -.0959 -.1319* -.2148** -.1556* -.2295** -.2214** -.1936**
B3 -.2539** -.1725** -.0826 -.1431* -.2589** -.1974** -.2704** -.2568** -.2486**
BPFEAR APDIRCTN BPDIRCTN APCONCEN BPCONCEN APIMAGRY BPIMAGRY APVIVIDN BPVIVIDN
B1 -.1808** .1032 .0215 .0300 -.0410 -.0311 -.1825** -.0871 -.2429**
B2 -.1505* .1363* .0082 .0457 -.0677 -.0495 -.2167** -.1132 -.2716**
B3 -.1900** .1717** .0839 .0789 .0073 -.0492 -.2560** -.1232* -.2908**
APSLFAWR BPSLFAWR APASTATE BPASTATE APAROUSL BPAROUSL APRATION BPRATION APVCONTR
B1 -.0969 -.1157 .1187 .1358* -.0443 .0304 -.0018 -.0832 -.0805
B2 -.0884 -.0849 .1071 .1132 -.0639 .0475 -.0134 -.0966 -.0701
B3 -.1011 -.1316* .1514* .1963** -.0634 -.0133 -.0162 -.0843 -.0830
BPVCONTR APMEMORY BPMEMORY APIDIALG BPIDIALG ADFLEXIB BDFLEXIB ADEQUANM BDEQUANM
B1 -.0600 .0924 .0065 -.1801** -.2861** -.0336 .0031 -.1296* -.0714
B2 -.0568 .0836 .0024 -.1857** -.2893** -.0314 -.0247 -.1454* -.0832
B3 -.0775 .0091 -.0658 -.2632** -.3447** -.0198 .0157 -.1653** -.1317*
ADDETACH BDDETACH ADPERSPI BDPERSPI ADBODLOC BDBODLOC ADDIRCTN BDDIRCTN ADONEPNT
B1 -.0913 -.0887 -.0870 -.1453* .0387 -.1407* .0826 .0002 .0304
B2 -.0838 -.0611 -.0864 -.1447* .0464 -.1681** .1232* -.0046 .0114
B3 -.0723 -.0667 -.1155 -.1423* .0085 -.1359* .1661** .0477 .0284
BDONEPNT ADABSORP BDABSORP ADCONTRL BDCONTRL ADVIGLNC BDVIGLNC ADDENSTY BDDENSTY
B1 -.0458 .0380 -.0228 -.1553* -.1264* -.1040 -.1094 .0148 -.0796
B2 -.0711 .0519 -.0543 -.1371* -.0816 -.0929 -.1177 .0030 -.1016
B3 -.0109 .0660 .0163 -.1744** -.1224* -.1507* -.1575* -.0453 -.1778**
ADSIMULT BDSIMULT
B1 -.2288** -.2343**
B2 -.2629** -.2720**
B3 -.2235** -.2236**
* - Signif. LE .05 ** - Signif. LE .01 (2-tailed) " . " printed if a coefficient cannot be computed